Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
They were fixed IDs, yes. The problem is something was going to be lost no matter what we did.Do you know what the reserved field id's were for the legacy sample fields - or are they different for every install based on users creating other fields?
Yes.For example, I have a 1.9.1 site that has a fieldid of 44 for the fax field in the _comprofiler_fields table. The last fieldid is 105. Would changing the fieldid for the fax to 106 prevent the upgrade from breaking the fax field?
No.Does the fieldid map to another table that I would need to change to match this?
Yes.As for sites I've already upgraded, would the same process as indicated above work for them?
What I meant by manually fixing was manually changing the field id to a non-reserved id. Any field id between 1 and 54 is reserved.I just want to be sure I didn't miss the point of what you were saying - when you say I just have to keep manually fixing it, I wasn't sure exactly what you meant - every time I update a 2.x install, or just to get through those sites I have not yet upgraded from 1.9.1.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.