uddeIM 1.5 released

Also for this problem you will find a solution in the FAQ.

I installed uddeIM on joomla 1.5.9 and CB 1.2 RC4 and everythings works wel. Now after upgrading to CB 1.2.0 i get the following error when i run Check CB plugins database:

[code:1]
All CB plugin "Default language (English)" Database is up to date.
CB plugin "PMS uddeIM": no database or no database description.
All CB plugin "Default" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "CB Core" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "WinClassic" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "WebFX" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "CB Menu" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "CB Connections" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "OSX" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "Luna" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "Content Author" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "Dark" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "Fireboard Forum" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "Mamblog Blog" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "YaNC Newsletters" Database is up to date.
All CB plugin "Private Message System" Database is up to date.

[/code:1]
The error:

CB plugin "PMS uddeIM": no database or no database description

Post edited by: DutchMan, at: 2009/01/29 22:47

Well, PMS uddeIM does not use any database?!?

Its not a bug, mybe a new feature in CB 1.2 so I have to add a description somewhere to avoid this message.

@nant: Can you help?

Maybe its because the XML installers do not have a

[code:1]<database>
</database>[/code:1]

part. So I will add this empty tags to all installers for uddeIM 1.6.

slabbi wrote:

Maybe its because the XML installers do not have a

[code:1]<database>
</database>[/code:1]

part. So I will add this empty tags to all installers for uddeIM 1.6.

Thanks, for your reply...

Can i add these, and how to add them? I looked and did find 2 xml files: uddeim.j15.xml and uddeim.xml

You have to add this to the CB plugins and there is only one XML file.

The last lines should be:
[code:1]
</tabs>
<database>
</database>
</cbinstall>[/code:1]

I have not tested this, so I am not sure if this really suppresses the message but from a quick look into the source I am quite sure it works.